#image_title
Every content team has a different idea of what ‘on brand’ means — until you write it down. I’ve found that having a content style guide is vital to getting it right without multiple revisions or rewrites.
I’ve seen long documents and cheat sheets, and both work as long as they explain why you do things the way you do.
That’s the real power: knowing when something strengthens your message — and when it waters it down. Especially now, with teams using AI to write faster, it’s never been more important to train both your tools and your people to sound like you.
So, what exactly goes into a content style guide — and why does it matter so much? Glad you asked. I’m going to show you.
Table of Contents
A content style guide — sometimes called a brand voice guide or editorial style guide — is your team’s go-to resource for how your brand communicates in writing. It covers everything from what to say, grammar, punctuation, formatting, and tone of voice across everything you publish.
Yes, even whether or not you use em dashes or capitalize the word after a colon!
Debating the same comma or tone choice over and over?
Tired of giving your team the exact same feedback over and over?
Getting frustrated with each editor requesting different stylistic changes — that all conflict with one another?
Those are all things I’ve experienced as a writer and editor. And guess what? They’re all signs you need a style guide.
Whether you’re working with freelancers, agencies, or in-house marketers, a solid content style guide helps you:
A content style guide sets the rules for how your brand sounds in writing — covering tone, voice, grammar, punctuation, and formatting across everything you publish.
A brand guide can mean a lot of things. It may focus on visual elements like logos, colors, and typography, or I’ve also seen them expanded to include messaging, brand values, and positioning.
Both play a key role in how people experience your brand. One shapes what they see, the other shapes what they hear.
Now that we’ve cleared that up, I’m going to show you how to create a content style guide that actually works.
There’s no one-size-fits-all formula here — but there is a framework that works.
Whether you’re starting from scratch or fine-tuning what you’ve already got, I’m listing the 12 steps I recommend for creating a style guide that clears things up for your team, brings consistency to your brand, and yes, makes your AI tools smarter, too.
A content style guide covers a lot — from brand values to grammar rules. You can start from scratch, but I recommend kicking things off with a solid template. It’ll help get your ideas on the page faster— and make sure you’re not forgetting something obvious (like whether to use title case in H2s).
HubSpot’s free style guide template is a great starting point. Or pull inspiration from one of the examples at the end of this post and make it your own.
Not every brand has a formal mission statement or core values. And actually, I kind of love it when they don’t because it’s a great discussion and leads to a session that creates a ton of clarity for both internal and external communications.
Wondering what that looks like? I’ve found it may be difficult to say what you want to do, but figuring out what you don’t want to be usually creates a killer discussion. Here are some of my favorite questions to get this going:
A few short answers to those questions will help your content style guide come to life so your writers can rally behind why you do things the way you do.
What else should you consider?
If your brand stands for transparency, your content should avoid hype and lean into clarity. If inclusivity is a core value, your guide should reflect that in both language and examples.
If what your brand says and what it practices don’t match up, readers can (and they will, trust me) see the disconnect — it’s like watching a TV show with bad lip-syncing.
Take it from Maddy Osman , founder of The Blogsmith , who knows how seriously brands should take conveying values like inclusivity through their content.
“We wanted our content practices to reflect what The Blogsmith stands for, and needed to find a way to get a team with diverse backgrounds on the same page,” says Osman.
To nurture these values, Maddy got the ball rolling by establishing clear-cut guidelines in her style guide.
“I sat down with team members to brainstorm what inclusivity would look like on paper — the things we normally don‘t account for in day-to-day speech. Whether it’s listing alternatives to outdated words like blacklist or manpower or examples of people-first language.”
The bottom line here is that your style guide is how you express your values.
Imagine writing to a Gen Z buyer vs. a Boomer. Same product, totally different tone. That’s why I always include simplified personas in a style guide — not full marketing profiles, but enough to ground content creators in who they’re speaking to.
New to buyer personas? I’ve done everything from semi-fictional characters with names to high-level descriptions of pain points and messaging. Both are fantastic. But if you’re about to tackle this for the first time, I recommend starting with HubSpot’s persona generator.
Amanda Price , content manager at Imagefix, is also totally on board: “Understanding who we’re communicating with is just as important as understanding our brand itself.”
Price adds that detailed buyer personas make sure a style guide “stops being about abstract rules and starts being a proper and useful tool to build a real connection with our readers.”
She’s right. And when personas are included, your guide becomes less about rules and more about relationships.
At minimum, I recommend including:
If you can go one step further and include actual phrasing they use—or language that’s proven to win them over—you’ll help your writers create content that feels personal, relevant, and usually converts well
Voice and tone get mixed up and overlooked all the time.
I’ve had more than a few animated discussions about the difference with other copywriters. That might say a lot about my personality… but it also speaks to how important this section is.
Because if you want your content (or your AI output) to sound on-brand, you’ve got to spend some time here.
Here’s how I break it down:
Think of it like this: When I talk to my clients, I sound like me. When I talk to my family, I still sound like me, but the tone is often very different. Your brand should work the same way.
To define your tone, a lot of brands reference Nielsen Norman Group’s four tone dimensions:
That’s a solid starting point. That said, I usually like to go deeper, taking my friend Justin Blackman’s approach from Brand Voice Academy. He starts with over 100 tone descriptors and distills a brand’s voice into one of nine styles that fall into three categories:
It’s the most comprehensive (and effective) approach I’ve seen—and it works beautifully, especially when you want to define a voice that scales across channels, teams, and AI tools.
Regardless of what approach you take, make sure to codify it with examples. Think “Say This, Not That.”
For example, if you’re a coaching brand that trades on humor, but never wants to come across as sarcastic or mean-spirited, you might have these:
✅ Messy starts count. So do snack breaks.
✅ You don’t need another planner. You need a plan that fits your life.
❌ This isn’t that hard, you know.
❌ You’re great at quitting — congrats.
If it’s helpful, you can also encourage people to channel their inner [celebrity name here]. (For me, it’s always Robin Arzon from Peloton.)
Wondering what else to include in this section?
Especially if you’re using generative AI, this section helps it learn what “sounding like you” actually means.
Want to stop arguing about em dashes and serial commas? Consider picking a reference style and stick with it — and just note any variations in the content style guide.
Lots of brands use the Associated Press Stylebook (AP) Chicago Manual of Style. Personally, I find AP a better fit for online content — less formal, easier to remember, and widely used by media outlets.
Source
Bernard Meyer, senior director of communications and creative at Omnisend, shares that he prefers AP Style as it helps Omnisend come across as friendlier and less formal.
Pro tip: Get your team an online subscription. It’s easier to search — and much more likely to be used — than a dusty print copy.
This is one of the most practical (and used!) sections of any guide.
Include:
Also be sure to make note of language preferences based on regional usage (color vs. colour, apartment vs. flat) and inclusive alternatives (blocklist vs. blacklist, “first-year student” vs. “freshman”).
This section saves editors so much time — and helps AI tools get more accurate, too.
You don’t need to rewrite your brand design manual here, but if your writers are expected to source, edit, or write for visual content, you do need to give them some direction.
Address common questions like:
If you have a paid stock image account, list it. If you want all graphics to have descriptive alt text (you should), make that clear.
Also, if you expect writers to include infographic content for designers and you have guidelines around what should be included, I highly recommend sharing that here, too.
This is where you prevent formatting chaos before it happens. At a minimum, cover your guidelines for
With consistent formatting, your readers will be able to skim and digest your information more easily.
No need to include your full SEO strategy here, but a basic overview helps writers avoid keyword stuffing or structure issues. I always recommend covering:
In addition to these sections, I also include links to external sources like HubSpot’s guide to SEO to ensure writers can find answers to their questions from reputable sources.
You’ve probably seen that stat about humans only having an 8-second attention span. BBC debunked it in 2017.
That’s the problem with relying on secondhand (or fifth-hand) data — once it’s out there, it spreads. So if you want your brand to sound credible, you need to be picky about your sources.
Because “Trust me, bro” doesn’t cut it.
Neither is that Medium post that links to a blog that links to a roundup from 2016. That’s lazy research and if you want to be credible, you need to make it clear to your writers that it won’t fly.
If you’re serious about trust and transparency, your style guide needs to spell out what “good” looks like.
If you want to create trustworthy, authoritative content, you’ve got to be picky about what you cite and where it comes from. And that means teaching your team — and your AI tools — how to tell the difference between solid data and sketchy filler.
And AI is notoriously untrustworthy, both at following directions and sourcing current data. Sometimes it makes things up, too.
So be sure to call out sources you want, what to avoid, and guidelines.
For example:
Examples of great sources:
“Sources” to avoid:
You may also want to include an example of how you want data cited.
Source
While that helps address most data-sourcing questions, you’ll also want to decide if competitor statistics and data are allowed.
My general rule is “yes!” if it’s reliable and trustworthy, but again, you’ve got to make the call for your business.
If you’re worried about search engine optimization (SEO), Osman, who is also ranked among the top 100 content marketers by Semrush, shares that she’s not “against using data from competitors. But you have to be careful from an SEO perspective if the data you’re referring to is a keyword competitor.”
Beyond that, it also depends on your brand’s core values. Meyer prefers to include “ helpful data even if the data comes from our competitors” because Omnisend wants to come across as a customer-centric brand.
Even if your team has good judgment, it helps to spell things out — especially for freelance contributors.
List any off-limits content, including:
Think of this as setting smart boundaries — so writers know what not to touch. And if there’s ever a possibility of an exception to the rule, outline the process for requesting that.
Source
This is the section most guides skip — and the one that makes the biggest difference.
Meyer agrees, “The more specific you can make [your style guide], the better your team will understand how to adopt it effectively.”
Osman also prefers adding examples. According to her, “style preferences make a lot more sense to writers when they see them executed in actuality — much like a case study.”
Here’s how I write content style guides to show the team what “good” looks like:
Style guides are living documents. The world isn’t static, customer expectations aren’t static, so I feel like it’s unrealistic to think you’ll never edit them.
My favorite content style guides are easy to follow because they are hyper clear. WIth that said, it’s not about creating rules for the sake of…well, having rules.
It’s about making everything simpler for your team and your customer base.
Pro tip: This shouldn’t just go to writers. I’d recommend sharing this with any core customer-facing teams. It’s helpful when marketing, sales, and customer service talk about things the same way.
Don’t try to do too much. I’ve shared a ton of things you can include and that I recommend including on some level. But you don’t have to go into detail on all of them. Here’s what I recommend leaving out — or at least linking to specific SOP documents.
Yes, content ops are the backbone of your process. But things like editorial calendars, request forms, approval workflows, and publishing timelines don’t belong in your style guide. Keep those reference links in your project playbooks. Your writers need writing guidance, not a lesson in Airtable.
This is one of those “your call” things. I personally like to include a page with the company logo, typography, and color palette. After all, they’re critical for the brand and it’s helpful for onboarding new team members.
But think high-level instead of 6 pages on how to use the logo. Instead, include that detail in a separate brand and visual style guide to convey the brand identity elements.
Stay as high-level as you can. If there’s important information writers need to refer to, include links to reference documents or how-to videos in the style guide, but don’t go overboard.
Rule of thumb: If it feels like a text, thin it out.
If you put in all that work, you want people to use it. Most will, but not everyone. I know it feels personal, especially when people have paid me to consult on their stuff and then ignore it, but I promise it’s not personal at all.
This is an area where change management principles rule the roost — so here’s what I’ve found works best:
Your freelancers won’t care, but if you have in-house writers, get their buy-in and make people feel like they’re part of the process. Even if you don’t take all of their suggestions, they feel some ownership in it.
Where possible, I like to come up with two equally awesome options for different categories and then let people weigh in on those options. I’m always fine with whatever they choose.
Store it where people already work. Link to it in onboarding docs, pin it in Slack, and reference it in briefs.
Personally, I love a living doc with a table of contents and quick-reference sections that are easy to skim.
It’s not a static set-and-forget document.
Not everyone should have edit access, but I do ask teams to flag questions or inconsistencies as they come up, and we review and update the doc regularly. It doesn’t have to be perfect on day one. Just keep it useful — and make updates part of your workflow.
If you want to see a writing style guide in action, here are a few examples of writing style guides I have liked from well-known companies like Google, Shopify, and Intuit.
In Google’s style guide, I noticed that Google is very explicit in its goal of creating clear, consistent content. It’s broken up into simple sections so that people can easily navigate what might seem like a complicated document
What I liked: My absolute favorite part of this guide is the statement, “This guide contains guidelines, not rules. Depart from it when doing so improves your content.”
Any rule that says “don’t follow the rules” is a HUGE win in my book.
I nerd out over this stuff, so when I found things broken down into categories that highlight what is most important to Intuit, I got excited.
What I liked: Not going to lie – I love this guide. It’s beautifully laid out and so easy to follow. Plus, for regulars, it includes a what’s new section so people can easily see what may have changed.
I found Shopify’s content style guide to be extensive. It walks the writers through voice and tone, inclusive language, grammar, and other style-related guidelines.
Unlike Intuit, I noticed that Shopify was clearer about its voice and tone requirements — they even included dos and don’ts with examples to explain how to match Shopify’s tone.
What I liked: Despite covering a range of style preferences, I appreciated that Shopify included an example for each concept.
Source
Like Shopify’s, Microsoft’s content style guide is also extensive, covering everything from proper nouns to bias-free communications. I also liked the examples Microsoft included. That said, Microsoft tried to stay minimalist and didn’t include examples for everything like Shopify.
What I liked: I found Microsoft’s style guide easier to navigate using the sidebar. You can filter the list of entries by title to find stuff faster. Plus, I love their headline, “Make every word matter.” I think it speaks to the importance of word choice and clarity.
Source
Instead of overwhelming writers with a laundry list of do this, not that right off the bat, it focuses the why behind each word. That said, if people want to dig deeper, particularly on technical content, they can literally dig into the A-Z of Apple’s style, starting with AAC and wrapping with Zoom.
Additionally, it suggests users follow the Chicago Manual of Style and Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary.
What I liked: While many content marketers might not prefer it, I liked Apple’s minimalist approach since a style guide is typically for things where you deviate from a reference manual. Plus it echoes Apple’s “less is more” approach.
I’ve been curious to see how Mailchimp’s notoriously scrappy approach might change after its 2021 acquisition by Intuit. While still playful and fun, its language has become much clearer (at least in my opinion). I’m not sure if I’d attribute this to Intuit or more following what I’m seeing as a trend in the industry.
While I’m generally not a fan of including media-specific guidelines in a style guide, Mailchimp does a great job. Since its style guide isn’t based on a single formal document, it was able to add process guidelines without overwhelming readers.
What I liked: I loved Mailchimp’s word list as it outlines exactly how to handle troublesome words in a minimalist way.
This example comes from HubSpot Partner Yokel Local. I love its simplicity, which makes it easy for both in-house contributors and freelancers to follow without going into the weeds.
What I liked: While Yokel Local remained minimalist, I loved that it still included examples to help writers get into the right mindset.
Style guides may seem like a strange thing to obsess over, but they make it so much easier for writers to pick up voice and run with it.
Whenever I work with someone who doesn’t have a content style guide, I create one — formally or informally — because it saves everyone time, frustration, and back-and-forth edits down the line. I build it right into the process, whether it’s baked into a statement of work or just something I develop naturally during onboarding and early drafts.
It’s worth it. Every time.
It saves a boatload of time and frustration for all parties — including the AI “members” of your team (wink, wink). When everyone knows what the expectation is and why you use the voice and tone you do, you have a cohesive team.
Remember — keep it as simple as you can and focus on clarity. The result will be content that feels and sounds like you.
Editor’s note: This post was originally published in May 2015 and has been updated for comprehensiveness.
I remember when ChatGPT first launched. The entire marketing community was split on whether they…
AyaHQ, a pan-African Web3 talent development startup, is in talks with investors to raise $10…
There are some lessons you only learn when life hits you hard. This week’s master…
In June, Leatherback, the UK-headquartered cross-border fintech once mired in fraud investigations, unveiled new executives…
A few years ago, I was in charge of presenting a big marketing strategy deck…
My inbox is like a box of chocolates: You never know what you’re gonna get…