Imagine the leaders that inspire you. Each is likely unique, with a different style they use to meet goals, motivate, and animate their teams.
There are many different styles of leadership, and each can have a different impact on a company.
In my experience, leadership styles can evolve over time, and I would argue that many of us can identify with several. Different circumstances or teams ask for different leadership approaches.
For example, I lead a boutique marketing agency with a small team, and I identify most with the democratic leadership type.
Over the years, though, my leadership style has definitely changed. Earlier in my career, I might’ve said my leadership type was transactional or pacesetting leadership. Now, I’m more aligned with democratic leadership.
Knowing your leadership style in depth can help you become a better leader for your team. In this post, I’ll cover the most common types of leadership, how they influence businesses, and tools to help you figure out what styles are best for you.
Start reading, or jump to the section you’re looking for:
A leadership style refers to a leader’s methods and behaviors when directing, motivating, and managing others. A person’s leadership style also determines how they strategize and implement plans while accounting for the expectations of stakeholders and the well-being of their team.
Knowing your leadership style helps you provide adequate guidance and feedback to employees, and better understand your thoughts, how you make decisions, and strategies you can consider implementing when making business decisions.
It can also help you understand how your direct reports see you and why they may give you specific feedback.
For example, if employees feel stifled at work and don’t have many opportunities to speak their minds, they may tell you that you’re an autocratic leader who can benefit from changing their style.
Knowing your leadership styles may help you improve with limited feedback.
Each leadership style has its pitfalls, allowing you to proactively address areas of improvement. This is critical because some employees might hesitate to speak up, even in an anonymous survey.
Ready to find out your leadership styles? Check out the most common styles below.
Also called: Participative or Facilitative Leadership
Democratic leadership is exactly what it sounds like — the leader makes decisions based on each team member‘s input. Although a leader makes the final call, each employee has an equal say in a project’s direction.
Democratic leaders often have the following characteristics:
This leadership style resembles how leaders often make decisions in company board meetings.
For example, a democratic leader might give the team a few decision-related options in a company board meeting.
They could then open a discussion about each option. After a discussion, this leader might consider the board’s thoughts and feedback, or they might open this decision up to a vote.
The democratic leadership style is one of the most effective because it encourages everyone to participate in all processes, share their opinions, and know that you will hear them.
It also encourages employees to be engaged because they know you will hear their feedback.
Team members feeling like they have space to participate can also increase employee empowerment, motivation, and participation.
Reaching a consensus can take considerable time, resources, and communication with a democratic style. It can also impact decision-making because some team members may not have the right expertise to make critical decisions.
I love identifying as the democratic leader type, and I feel I’ve grown into it over time. Previously, I might’ve identified as a transactional or maybe a pacesetting leader, depending on my environment and project needs.
Democratic feels more like where I’m ‘supposed’ to be; it fits perfectly and feels authentic.
As a democratic leader, the characteristics above are true for me. I reap the benefits and value of this leadership style. That said, the challenges are equally as apparent.
I live my life assuming that everyone knows something that I don’t. This can be challenging because even the administration of reaching a group consensus is a lot.
And while I love to give everyone equal weight in discussions and decisions, I worry that this can pressure team members who aren’t ready for such input. I have to remind myself that this isn’t everyone’s idea of fun.
As a democratic leader, I aim to curate genuine relationships with my team and find opportunities for them to make meaningful contributions.
In Dharmesh Shah’s free ebook, Lessons on Leadership the value of these goals are highlighted as a service to employees.
Genuine relationships builds trust and gives employees a reason to work beyond the paycheck. Opportunities for contribution help employees feel valued.
Featured Resources
Also called: Authoritarian, Coercive, or Commanding Leadership
Autocratic leadership is the inverse of democratic leadership. In this leadership style, the leader makes decisions without taking input from anyone who reports to them.
Autocratic leadership is typically characterized by:
This style is most useful when a business needs to control specific situations, not as a standalone leadership style. For instance, it can be effective in emergency or crisis situations where quick and decisive action is necessary.
Autocratic leaders carry out strategies and directives with absolute focus.
So, when a situation calls for it, an authoritative leader can make a quick best-fit decision for a business without needing to get additional input (helpful on a case-by-case basis).
This type of leadership is most effective when a company makes difficult decisions that don’t benefit from additional input from others who aren’t fully knowledgeable on the subject.
Responsible parties can make a decision and give employees a clear sense of direction, and it can also make up for a lack of experience on a team.
Most organizations can’t sustain such a hegemonic culture without losing employees, which can significantly lower morale and creative problem-solving.
An example of authoritative leadership gone bad could be when a manager changes the hours of work shifts for employees without consulting anyone.
Other challenges with autocratic leaders include:
Also called: Delegative or Hands-off Leadership
If you remember your high-school French, you’ll accurately assume that laissez-faire leadership is the least intrusive form of leadership. The French term “laissez-faire” literally translates to “let them do.”
Leaders who embrace it give nearly all authority to their employees and don’t often interject unless the situation calls for it.
Some key characteristics of laissez-faire leadership include:
Laissez-faire leaders make employees accountable for their work. This gives many employees an incentive to do their best work.
This type of leader often creates a more relaxed company culture. This makes it a good model for creative businesses like ad agencies or product design. It’s also a good fit for a business with a highly-skilled team.
In a young startup, for example, you might see a laissez-faire company founder who makes no major office policies around work hours or deadlines.
They might put complete trust in their employees while they focus on the overall workings of running the company.
Because of this high level of trust, employees working for laissez-faire leaders feel valued. They get the information they need and use their resources and experience to meet business goals.
Although laissez-faire leadership can empower employees by trusting them to work however they’d like, there are downsides.
It can limit team development and pose a challenge for new or inexperienced employees who would benefit from guidance as they get ramped up. Roles and responsibilities can also become unclear, and it can build a culture of working in silos where people might work autonomously rather than as a cohesive group.
This style can lead to overlooking critical company growth and learning opportunities, so keeping this leadership style in check is important.
Meg Prater is the senior manager of content at HubSpot. Prater describes herself as a mix of laissez-faire and coaching leadership styles.
Prater says, “I like to trust the people I hire to do great work, but I also like to tailor my approach to each person on my team to best fit their working styles and career goals.”
Prater notes that some of her team thrive with more structure, and others thrive with more autonomy. What’s universal is the need for strong alignment and communication within our team.
“My priority (and my job) is to ensure that my direct reports understand our team and company-wide goals and how their individual output contributes to those goals,” she says. “Once we‘re aligned on expectations, we can work together to identify initiatives that push the needle … while fulfilling each person’s interests and professional growth on the team.”
One of the challenges for a laissez-faire leader is balancing the desire to trust the team while providing the guidance needed for inexperienced team members.
In my early career, my senior manager was a laissez-faire leader, and I sometimes felt a lack of guidance. However, as a bold problem-solver, I also appreciated the autonomy I had under this type of manager.
In some ways, the need to solve the problem alone helped develop those problem-solving skills, but I can see how it would be difficult for some team members.
Prater’s coaching leadership style also comes into play because she values the role of the leader and the benefit of feedback to employees.
Prater says, “I had the luxury of working with a fantastic leadership coach shortly after becoming a manager. She drilled into me the notion of ‘Being a kind manager rather than being a nice manager.’”
Prater notes that it‘s tempting to water down feedback or expectations — to be nice. It feels less uncomfortable but doesn’t always benefit either the manager or the direct report in the long run.
“Being clear, actionable, and direct can lead to uncomfortable conversations, but ultimately, those are the conversations that help both sides grow. That advice has really shaped me as a manager. While I don’t always nail it, ‘kindness over niceness’ gives me a North Star,” she says.
Featured Resources
Strategic leaders sit between a company’s primary operations and its growth opportunities. This form of leadership requires vision, competitive awareness, and adaptability.
These leaders accept the burden of executive interests but also ensure that working conditions are stable for everyone else.
Strategic leaders aim to guide their organization toward its long-term goals. By utilizing this leadership style, you can create a forward-thinking, agile, and adaptable organization that can thrive in today’s dynamic business landscape.
Strategic leaders tie plans for growth and strategy to how they manage a team. They ask questions, develop and execute strategies, and consider future growth. This approach supports popular business goals like:
This is a desirable leadership style in many companies because strategic thinking supports many types of employees at once.
Strategic thinking supports many employees at once, so it’s a desirable style for many companies. It encourages visualization, planning, and making the most of existing resources, and it can motivate employees.
Leaders who work strategically might take on too much and risk thinking too far into the future of possibilities while missing critical present-day issues.
It’s important to learn how to delegate with this leadership style and share the weight of decision-making.
Compromise, communication skills, and consistent outreach are also essential.
Transformational leaders gain the trust and confidence of their teams, encourage team members, and lead employees toward meeting company goals.
Transformational leadership also always improves upon the company’s conventions and motivates employees to grow and further develop their skills.
Ultimately, the goal of a transformational leader is to create a lasting positive impact, uplift their team to achieve their full potential and drive success for the organization.
Transformational leaders can inspire their teams to think in new ways. This can help companies update business processes to improve productivity and profitability. It can also help with employee satisfaction, morale, and motivation.
This is a highly encouraging form of leadership where employees are supported and encouraged to see what they’re capable of.
When starting a job with this type of leader, all employees might get a list of goals to reach and deadlines for reaching them. The goals might begin quite simple, but as employees grow and meet their goals, leaders will give them more tasks and challenges to conquer as they grow with the company.
Transformational leaders can lose sight of everyone’s individual learning curves in place of the company’s goals. Employee burnout can also become an issue, so it’s important to work with your team to update benchmarks.
Pam Bump is HubSpot’s head of content innovation and research. She feels an alignment with a few styles but identifies most strongly with transformational leadership as her dominant style.
Bump describes her experience as a transformational leader. Before she was a manager, her role involved audience growth, brand development, experimentation, and tapping new markets.
“I’ve always jumped at major problem-solving opportunities, ambiguous requests from leadership, and identifying big bets for my companies,” she says. “Now … I encourage my team to do the same — whether they’re working on a joint team experiment or are individually investigating, launching, and scaling their own high-ROI projects.”
She is an inspirational leader who makes a conscious effort to balance the business‘s goals, the team’s needs, and individual needs. As listed as a challenge, transformational leaders can forget individual learning needs and the overall company’s needs.
Bump has the solution, “To balance ambitious overall, transformative team-wide goals, and individual teammate needs, I check in with my direct reports about their growth, what they’re working on, and work that can help them grow their skills or visibility while also supporting team goals.”
Beyond weekly 1:1s, Bump also holds semi-regular career chats to discuss their personal long-term goals and the tactics or skills they can use to get there.
Featured Resources
Transactional leadership is based on reward and punishment to motivate and direct the behavior. These managers set specific rules and standards, and they closely monitor their employees’ performance.
They tell employees they can expect rewards if a goal is met. However, they may require more 1:1s or check-ins if people aren’t meeting goals.
This leadership style is concerned with maintaining the status quo and ensuring that predetermined goals and standards are met.
It also assumes that teams need structure and monitoring to meet business goals and that they are reward-motivated.
This style is popular in enterprise companies as it focuses on results, existing structures, and set systems of rewards or penalties. This leadership style also recognizes and rewards commitment.
Transactional leaders can offer helpful clarity and structure of expectations, which can help employees feel safe because they understand expectations. Employees also have a clear view of what they get in return for meeting business goals.
This style is more about using rewards to motivate and less about building relationships with employees, coaching, and developing team morale.
Keeping a diverse team engaged can be hard if only some are reward-motivated, and it can lead to low creativity and fear of punishment.
Also called: Conscious Leadership
A coaching leader focuses on identifying and nurturing the individual strengths of each team member and developing strategies that will enable teams to work better together.
This style is similar to strategic and democratic leadership, but it emphasizes individual employees’ success.
A manager with this leadership style might help employees improve on their strengths by:
They might also encourage one or more team members to expand on their strengths by learning new skills from other teammates.
Coaching leaders focus on building trust and establishing strong relationships with their team members.
They foster an environment of open communication and psychological safety that encourages individuals to share ideas, seek feedback, and work together toward common objectives.
Coaching leaders actively support skill development and independent problem-solving. They meet ambitious business goals by creating a strong company culture and add to a business’s long-term vision as valuable mentors, often even after leaving a company.
This leadership style can motivate employees as they feel supported on the team. It recognizes that each employee is unique and can build diverse and exciting teams where each employee offers something different.
This leader focuses on high performance, with employees who can communicate well and embrace unique skill sets to get work done. They also encourage team members to seek new challenges, learn from experiences, and continuously improve their skills and knowledge.
It can take a lot of time to develop employees with a coaching style, but mentoring isn’t effective for every employee.
Marja Vitti is an editor at HubSpot who identifies with the coaching leadership style. I’ve received great feedback from Vitti on my pieces, and I think the coaching leadership style is a great fit.
On her leadership style, Vitti says, “While working with freelance writers and content creators, I quickly realized both the team and the work would benefit from leadership that recognized their individual strengths.”
Vitti notes that she gave everyone on my team the same opportunities but also showed up for them as individuals. One team member might need more positive reinforcement to gain confidence, another might show signs of needing a new challenge, and another might be burning out and need a lighter load.
“It was intuitive for me to lead with this coaching style, and it wasn’t till after that I realized this was a designated leadership style,” Vitti notes.
Vitti’s guidance on my writing is always conscientiously given. She always invites further feedback and discussion, which I find empowering but soothing.
Any writer will know it can be hard to receive feedback on the work you’ve poured your soul into, but she knows how to balance the value of encouraging improvement with the writer’s need to feel supported.
Featured Resources
Bureaucratic leaders follow the rules. Unlike autocratic leadership, they might listen and consider the input of employees, but they might reject input that doesn’t align with company policy or past practices.
Some key features of bureaucratic leadership include:
This style works best for larger, older, or traditional companies that are successful in their current processes.
This leadership style works for these businesses because they want to maintain existing business models and processes because their current strategies are successful, and trying something new that doesn’t work could waste time and resources.
This leadership style can be challenging for some, but it has many benefits. It lowers the risk of favoritism and replaces it with central duties, job security, and predictability.
This clear and efficient leadership style can lead to high levels of creativity for some employees.
Employees might not feel as controlled as autocratic leadership, but there can be a lack of freedom in how much people can do in their roles.
This approach can shut down innovation and is not the right fit for companies chasing ambitious goals and quick growth.
Featured Resources
Also called: Affiliative Leadership
Visionary leadership focuses on future and long-term goals. They aim to inspire and guide their team towards the achievement of a shared vision.
This type of leader encourages collaboration, emotional intelligence, and teamwork. They also foster a culture of innovation and change, encouraging individuals to embrace new ideas and approaches.
Visionary leaders can create a clear plan for employees to follow and execute. They are powerful and persuasive communicators, which helps them energize teams toward impactful business growth.
As the focus is on future growth, visionary leaders can forecast potential roadblocks and outline action plans, giving employees increased confidence during uncertainty or challenging times.
Teams can do more and enjoy their work more if they have a vision to work toward. This type of leader offers vision statements and other tools to inspire and motivate teams to engage at work.
Visionary leaders can skip over day-to-day issues to focus on long-term ideas, missing roadblocks that could build up and cause problems in the future.
Another common challenge is hyper-focusing on a single goal, which can impact consideration for other ideas that may be just as valuable to the business.
John Xie, co-founder and CEO at Taskade, identifies as a Visionary Leader. Like me, Xie developed his leadership style over time.
He says, “It took me a while to develop this leadership style. However, after working with many people at many different companies over the years, I realize that I’m best when I am encouraging a positive long-term vision for the team. Then they can see how their work will be impactful and stay motivated to keep going.”
As a visionary leader, Xie recognises the pitfalls and potential challenges. He knows he can be “a little too strategic,” but he’s found a way to “lean back and motivate the team.”
On overcoming the challenges of a visionary leader, he says, “Everyone has their own unique style, and it‘s best to find the one that suits you naturally. When you try to force a different leadership style, you’ll notice the team quickly becoming disengaged, and that’s when you know you should revert back to your natural style.”
Featured Resources
A pacesetting leader sets ambitious standards and expects employees to meet those goals in the exact manner they’ve laid out.
These leaders expect productivity and high-quality outputs from employees, and they may step in to ensure things are done correctly and on time. As a pacesetter, this leader type paves the way and leads by example.
Some characteristics of a pacesetting leader include:
This type of leader sets ambitious goals with a clear and focused effort, so employees know exactly what is expected of them. For example, pacesetting sales leaders set and exceed ambitious quarterly sales cadences.
These leaders might also work alongside their team and push performance, boosting team morale.
Skilled and experienced teams often thrive under this kind of leader. They use the abilities of motivated and competent team members and make meeting goals feel urgent and exciting.
It can also be gratifying for team members to see their leader working hard alongside them.
Pacesetting leaders can sometimes create a high-stress workplace environment if goals are unrealistic, which can overwhelm and demotivate teams.
This can impact engagement and lead to burnout, where people struggle to meet goals and perform as expected.
Focusing on goals can also stifle creativity and diversity of thought, so employees don’t feel they can use their expertise to suggest alternative goals or strategies.
Featured Resources
Situational leaders change their management style to meet the needs of the situation or team. It suggests that effective leaders must adapt their leadership style to match the readiness and development levels of their team members.
This leadership style involves analyzing specific situations, assessing the competence and commitment of individuals, and adjusting the leadership approach accordingly.
It is proactive and recognizes that change is the only constant.
This leadership approach can motivate employees and ensure that people aren’t stuck working in a way that doesn’t make sense for the situation.
It’s also valuable for startups or businesses requiring frequent changes and flexible talent and support.
Situational leaders are great communicators and use team feedback to make decisions. They also analyze market changes and can quickly evaluate and update processes to ensure success.
This can create strong relationships and help employees see and feel their value to the business.
Leaders need a high level of expertise in all business processes and functions to make decisions, and they must be able to pivot quickly.
It’s important to remember long-term goals and meet immediate needs; not every leader can do this effectively.
It can become confusing and stressful for teams if a leader’s approach changes too often, as they won’t know what to expect.
Kaitlin Milliken is a senior program manager at HubSpot. She’s the editor who hired me to work with HubSpot, and we’ve been working together for eighteen months.
On her leadership style, Milliken says, “Throughout my career, I’ve found myself changing how I lead based on who I’m working with. I naturally adapt to what other people need, so this type of leadership definitely fits my style.”
Milliken notes that this type of leadership allows her to work with people who have varying experience levels. Someone new to the field may need more mentorship. An expert may want to focus on organizational needs.
“It’s challenging to lead if I’m not very familiar with a person’s expertise. That’s something I’m always working on,” she says.
As someone working directly under Milliken, I’ve always appreciated her openness to provide autonomy. I feel comfortable recommending ideas and edits where I think they make sense. As a situational leader, Milliken welcomes these ideas but also expresses her genuine appreciation and praise.
Writing for HubSpot has always meant a lot to me. Early on, this led to some imposter syndrome, but thanks to Milliken’s leading style, I grew to feel empowered, trusted, and comfortable.
Featured Resources
There’s no single “best” leadership style, so figuring out what is best for you and your environment is essential.
Leaders need good instincts, and many leaders focus on their own experiences and habits as they develop a leadership style.
As you start your path toward leadership, you may want to keep notes. Write down how you would handle specific situations or problems.
Doing this can help you be a confident and capable leader, but if you notice things aren’t going as expected, you may want to reconsider your approach.
Your instincts and habits will always impact the way you lead. But if you find yourself in situations that you’re unsure how to respond to, you may want to look at other leadership styles.
For example, if you’re an extrovert with a shy member on your team, you may want to work on active listening.
If you’re an introvert leading a team of outgoing people, you may need to learn new ways to nurture, support, and inspire your team.
Lisa Lanier, President and CEO of Lanier Law Group, P.A., values the role of instinct in leadership. Lanier says, “I naturally have strong maternal instincts, so I love to guide and support my team in a nurturing way.
But I can also be firm and decisive when the situation demands it. Similarly, if someone is going through a challenging time, I’m there to offer understanding and support. It really comes down to empathy and compassion — leading with my heart, but also being direct and clear.”
Instincts will always influence leadership, but as Lanier says, sometimes you need to rely on your own decision-making for when a situation needs a leader to take control.
Lanier continues, “This adaptability, I think, comes from a combination of nature and experience. I‘m naturally drawn to helping and guiding others, but I’ve also learned a lot from my mistakes and failures.
Being resilient and learning from those experiences has helped me refine my approach and become more effective in different situations.”
While it may take some time and effort, you can always change your leadership style and improve your processes.
I personally shifted my leadership style from transactional or pacesetting leadership to democratic leadership. I like and value all of these leadership styles — but with confidence and experience, I feel most authentic when leading with a democratic style.
The first step to making changes is recognizing the need for change. Whether this comes from direct employee feedback, noticing that goals aren’t being met, or people seeming to experience burnout, identifying this is the first step.
Scott Knutson, founder and chief serving officer at Leading2Serve, shifted his leadership style based on feedback. He initially followed the lead of the leaders he was exposed to when he was promoted into a leadership role.
“Since command and control was what I saw, command and control is how I led. And it worked. Our numbers were always good, and usually better than what was required. I liked showing company leadership that I could lead a team to success,” he says.
However, Knutson notes, “My success was totally about me. I wasn’t concerned about anyone else. This became abundantly clear when I was required to complete a 360-degree assessment and learned that my team hated me. That was a figurative kick in the gut that forced me to begin to learn about different leadership styles.”
As Knutson highlights, your leadership style may be effective for your team, but you might have a more challenging time connecting with people.
You don’t necessarily want to throw out your current style, but you’d want to identify what is and isn’t working. Then, get curious, and begin the work of adjusting the way you lead.
Knutson took back control by researching leadership styles. He says, “Successful leaders led me to understand that leadership is not about the leader but about the team. Focusing on my team and helping them to be successful became what drove me.”
Knutson initially called this style people-centered leadership. But then, he discovered the writings of Robert K. Greenleaf and his focus on servant leadership.
“I was immediately drawn to his belief that by focusing first on your team, not the company or the customer, this would bring the success that everyone wanted,” Knutson says.
Though you’re making a change for the better, changing your leadership style might not be easy.
In his pivot to a new leadership style, Knutson found it challenging to manage the reactions from other leaders.
He says, “Many times I was scoffed at and disregarded because of some misinformation — that [his new leadership style] was soft [and] had no backbone.
It wasn’t until the turn of the century and the plethora of research … that started to be shared that those of us who chose to be servant leaders had the data to back up our claims.”
There is a lot to learn from Knutson’s experience: Changing leadership style is sometimes necessary, but it won’t always be easy. If changing your leadership style feels right for you, you should try it.
The key, in my opinion, is authenticity. When I identified more with a transactional or pacesetting leadership style, I was left with more challenges and few benefits.
Benefits are abundant to both styles, but I struggled to connect with them when I wasn’t truly being me.
There are many ways to find a leadership style that works for you. Because of this, it can be tough to know where to begin. If you’re not sure what leadership styles will work for you, these steps can help.
Everyone has a unique path to self-discover. Some take risks and try new things and others prioritize quiet time, writing exercises, and listing strengths and weaknesses.
Another path to learning about yourself is through physical activity and spending time with other people. However you go about it, getting to know yourself is an important first step toward being a leader.
The journey of getting to know yourself will lead you to a sense of authenticity. Gauri Manglik, CEO and co-founder at Instrumentl, values the role of authenticity in leadership.
She says, “Leadership is a journey, and you never stop learning. But staying true to your values and leading with authenticity is key.”
Knowing yourself will help you understand what’s important to you and where you struggle. Being a leader means working quickly and making decisions quickly, so having your values mapped out can be extremely helpful.
As you write out your values, look at pivotal moments in your life to date. Then, look for trends, people you’re drawn to, and common themes. If your list is long, group similar ideas together.
Having an outline can help you see how you react, your strengths and weaknesses, and a base for your core values.
Mark W Lamplugh Jr., CEO at South Jersey Treatment Management Company, is heavily driven by his values around shared decision-making.
He says, “The leadership journey I have been through was heavily influenced by my experience in marketing and the mental health domain, where empathy and understanding are very crucial. In the style of participative leadership, I feel most connected with its values that support shared decision-making.”
Lamplugh noted the progression was natural. As he began to advance professionally, it became clear that collective brainstorming sessions were the best places for ideas to flourish.
“In fact, in mental health care particularly, respecting and recognizing different perspectives is vital not only for creative thinking but also for delivering compassionate care,” he notes.
Observing leaders you respect can also help you define your leadership style. As you watch them in meetings, client conversations, and presentations, take notes of what you like.
Another approach is to view their actions with specific leadership styles in mind, helping you figure out what their approach is and whether it will work for you.
The important thing to note is that the leadership style must work for you. Gauri Manglik found her way to her leadership style after emulating the bosses or mentors she admired.
She says, “My leadership style developed organically over my career. Early on, I tried to emulate bosses or mentors I admired. But I quickly learned that I needed to develop my own style that fit my personality and strengths.”
Watching leaders is a great place to start, but developing your own style is a must. Even our most aspirational leaders might not hold all the clues to our leadership style.
A hands-on option is to try out different leadership styles. You can create an outline of what interests you and review your notes before your next meeting to see how you can incorporate it into your interactions.
I spoke to many leaders when writing this article, and there’s a common theme: leadership styles are developed over time.
Connor Gillivan, CMO at TrioSEO, started experimenting with leadership styles in college. He says, “I got real-life experience [of leadership] starting my own e-commerce business in college and building a team of 30 plus team members over four years.”
In over 15 years of being an entrepreneur, Gillivan’s leadership style has evolved.
His goal as a leader is to put people in a win-win-win situation: “a win for them in their personal growth, a win for the company in its growth stage, and a win for me in terms of growth,” he says.
Working with a business coach can also help you hone your leadership style.
A mentor can be someone in your workplace you respect and would appreciate feedback from, whether it’s another leader or a colleague you respect. You can also check out this guide on how to find a business coach.
Matthew Sanjari, founder and business coach at PRIME Consulting, says, “I’ve spent a significant amount of time developing my leadership style by being coached and mentored myself.”
Another way to find the best style for your needs is to ask other colleagues, leaders, and team members for feedback.
The best approach for this strategy is to plan out what you want to ask and why so you get the feedback you need. Think about how people might respond and also set clear guidelines and expectations.
When you get feedback, make sure to listen carefully. You’ll gain valuable information about your strengths and weaknesses that will help you understand where you need to improve and the style that will help you improve.
Bhavik Sarkhedi, CMO at Write Right, credits feedback with helping him develop his style. He also describes his leadership journey as “transformative.”
He says, “My leadership style leans towards transformational leadership — I strive to inspire and motivate my team by setting a vision that pushes boundaries and fosters innovation.”
Sarkhedi notes that this style didn’t emerge overnight. It was cultivated through continuous learning, feedback, and adapting to different challenges.
“Early in my career, I observed various leaders, noting what resonated with their teams and what didn’t. Reading extensively, from classic leadership tomes to contemporary articles, provided theoretical backing to the practical insights I gathered,” Sarkhedi says.
Leadership assessments are helpful tools for leaders, yourself as an individual, and teams.
A leadership quiz can make it easier to understand your strengths and skills. It can surface habits and qualities you might not be aware of and give you a clear direction for growth.
If this is something you want to try, the leadership assessment below is a great place to start.
Inge Von Aulock, CEO of Top Apps, believes that high self-awareness makes a good leader.
She says, “There are a few key aspects of strengths-based leadership to consider. It requires you to have self-awareness because you have to get brutally honest with yourself about your own strengths through assessments and feedback.”
Leaders carry a mix of the leadership styles mentioned above. At the root of these styles, leadership experts Bill Torbert and David Rooke say, are what are called “action logics.”
These action logics assess “how [leaders] interpret their surroundings and react when their power or safety is challenged.”
That’s the idea behind the Leadership Development Profile, a popular management survey tool. Created by professor Torbert and psychologist Susanne Cook-Greuter — and featured in the book Personal and Organizational Transformations.
The survey uses a set of 36 open-ended sentence completion tasks to help researchers better understand how leaders develop and grow.
Below, we’ve used open-ended sentences to outline six action logics that describe each one. Review the sentences, see how they resonate with you, and figure out which leadership style upholds based on the action logic you most align with.
The individualist is self-aware, creative, and primarily focused on their actions and development as opposed to overall organizational performance.
This action logic is exceptionally driven by the desire to exceed personal goals and constantly improve their skills.
Here are some things an individualist might say:
Individualist 1: “A good leader should always trust their own intuition over established organizational processes.”
Individualist 2: “It’s important to be able to relate to others so I can easily communicate complex ideas to them.”
Individualist 3: “I’m more comfortable with progress than sustained success.”
Strategists are acutely aware of the environments they’re in and have a deep understanding of the structures and processes that make their businesses tick. Still, they’re also able to evaluate what could be improved.
Here are some things a strategist might say:
Strategist 1: “A good leader should always be able to build a consensus in divided groups.”
Strategist 2: “It’s important to help develop the organization as a whole, as well as the growth and individual achievements of my direct reports.”
Strategist 3: “Conflict is inevitable, but I‘m knowledgeable enough about my team’s personal and professional relationships to handle the friction.”
Rooke and Tolbert describe the alchemist as highly evolved and effective at managing organizational change.
They differ from other action logics in their unique ability to simultaneously see the big picture and minute details. No department or employee gets overlooked with an alchemist leader.
Here are some things an alchemist might say:
Alchemist 1: “A good leader helps their employees reach their highest potential, and possesses the necessary empathy and moral awareness to get there.”
Alchemist 2: “It‘s important to make a profound and positive impact on whatever I’m working on.”
Alchemist 3: “I have a unique ability to balance short-term needs and long-term goals.”
Opportunists are guided by a certain level of mistrust of others, relying on a facade of control to keep their employees in line.
“Opportunists tend to regard their bad behavior as legitimate in the cut and thrust of an eye-for-an-eye world,” Rooke and Tolbert write.
Here are some things an opportunist might say:
Opportunist 1: “A good leader should always view others as potential competition to be bested, even if it’s at the expense of their professional development.”
Opportunist 2: “I reserve the right to reject the input of those who question or criticize my ideas.”
Unlike the opportunist, the diplomat isn’t concerned with competition or assuming control over situations.
Instead, this action logic seeks to cause minimal impact on their organization by conforming to existing norms and completing their daily tasks with as little friction as possible.
Here are some things a diplomat might say:
Diplomat 1: “A good leader should always resist change since it risks causing instability among their direct reports.”
Diplomat 2: “It‘s important to provide the ’social glue’ in team situations, safely away from conflict.”
Diplomat 3: “I tend to thrive in more team-oriented or supporting leadership roles.”
The expert is a pro in their given field, constantly striving to perfect their knowledge of a subject and perform to meet their own high expectations.
Rooke and Tolbert describe the expert as a talented individual contributor and a source of knowledge for the team. But, this action logic does lack something central to many good leaders: emotional intelligence.
Here are some things a diplomat might say:
Expert 1: “A good leader should prioritize their own pursuit of knowledge over the needs of the organization and their direct reports.”
Expert 2: “When problem-solving with others in the company, my opinion tends to be the correct one.”
So, which action logic above felt like you? Think about each sentence for a moment.
Now, check out which of the seven leadership styles you embrace on the right based on the sentences you resonated with on the left.
Alt text: Table shows action logic sentences with associated leadership styles so you can identify your leadership style using examples.
The more action logics you agree with, the more likely you are to practice a mix of leadership styles.
For example, if you agreed with everything the strategist said, this would make you a 66% strategic leader and 33% democratic leader.
If you agreed with the third statement and everything the alchemist said, this would make you a 50% transformational, 25% strategic, and 25% democratic leader.
Keep in mind that these action logics are considered developmental stages, not fixed attributes — most leaders will progress through multiple types of leadership throughout their careers.
Whether you manage a big or small team, your leadership style heavily impacts how your direct reports see you and how your team works together to achieve your company’s goals.
There are many different styles of leadership, so choosing one that works for you can make you a more effective leader.
If you want to be a leader that makes a difference, you’ll need to keep growing and embrace change. Are you ready to get started?
Editor’s note: This post was originally published in August 2016 and has been updated for comprehensiveness.
Over at Masters in Marketing, Caroline, Laura, and I have interviewed some very bright minds…
As a content professional with almost a decade in the game, I have been a…
Welcome to Creator Columns, where we bring expert HubSpot Creator voices to the Blogs that…
As a content marketer, I‘ve always been ready to team up to boost a brand’s…
I went to a psychic when I was 22. She told me I was “about…
Welcome to Creator Columns, where we bring expert HubSpot Creator voices to the Blogs that…